Detained Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has given conditions for true reconciliation to be achieved in Nigeria.
He gave conditions for true reconciliation, demanding the siting of an international airport, seaport, and good roads in the South East to bring the long-abandoned zone up to speed with other regions.
Kanu who said he was not opposed to genuine restructuring, insisted that Nigeria should be totally restructured along the 1963 Constitution if proponents of restructuring are sincere.
Click The Image To Know More About ELEOS SPECIALIST HOSPITAL👇
The pro-Biafra movement leader whose position was made public by his younger brother, Prince Emmanuel after a recent visit to the IPOB Leader, explained that his position on the Nigeria project has not changed.
He was quoted as blaming those who aborted his next meeting with Igbo Leaders scheduled for September 15, 2017, in Enugu, for the current chaos in the South East, arguing that if his house were not invaded a day before the meeting, perhaps the outcome of the meeting would have addressed the issues fueling the agitation for Biafra.
Below is the full position of Kanu as conveyed by his brother:
“1 My position has remained unchanged for very many years, regardless of my unjust and unfair incarceration. Our demand for a referendum to determine whether our people will choose to remain in the country that has so unkindly treated us for decades, remain our goal, unless those opposing the wholesome restructuring of the country repent.
“2 We are resolute because the oppressor leaves us no choice. Since the 1980s and the 1990s, every plea to return the country to the 1963 constitution, has sadly fallen on deaf ears, leaving us no choice than to find any avenue that would guarantee a safe future and better tomorrow for our unborn grandchildren. We have no regrets whatsoever articulating a better future for our progeny.
“3 Being mocked consistently over our earlier demand for an early return to true federalism and devolution of powers, we saw we had no other choice than to work towards a referendum to determine our future. Our decision and preference for our own country where our children will be fairly treated is as a result of the unacceptable unabating mistreatment since 1966. First, the horrendous pogroms, then the bitter war, the deliberate disempowerment after the war (the £20 offer), the scorched earth policy and war of attrition viciously visited on our region ever since.
“4 The deliberate denial of critical federal government-driven basic infrastructure such as a functional commercial seaport, railways, international Airport with cargo wing, dry port (container terminal), greater electricity generation, export free zone, and East/West railway and road network that will help our people feel like being truly part of the country, confirms our second class status, which we reject. The unkind marginalization we have suffered as a region since 1970, is only possible because of the centralised structure enabled by the unitary 1999 constitution.
“5 We remain committed to our demand for a referendum as long as those totally opposed to the restructuring of the country along the lines of true federalism and power devolution continue to resist the cry for a new fair, just, and equitable constitution along the lines of the 1963 Republican constitution. We will be betraying our people and selling away their future, if we continue to wobble along in this unhelpful 1999 unitary constitution designed and written, and given by unelected soldiers.
“6 I led marches in the UK pleading for a consensual restructuring of the country via a constitutional conference and the enthronement of a new people’s constitution all through the 1990s. We were mocked and ridiculed consistently by a small clique of compatriots, who claimed they were born to rule. Their stiff opposition to a peaceful restructuring of the country, made our agitation inevitable. They are simply telling us “to go to hell” and “do our worst.”
“7 At the meeting with the South East Governors on 30th August 2017, I pleaded with the Governors to plead with Mr President to begin the early restructuring of the country along the lines of true federalism and devolution of power back to the 1963 constitution. I also pleaded for affirmative action to expedite the immediate construction of the earlier mentioned deliberately denied infrastructure in our region. The response was a vicious military attack to violently eliminate me on the 14th of September 2017, a day before the follow-up concluding meeting.
“8 We are not averse to the genuine restructuring of the country. We know that the country cannot grow or make progress under the current unworking unitary structure. The facts are clear for all to see. Our position remains the same as our submission in the presence of Prof Ben Nwabueze and Evangelist Elliot Ugochukwu-Uko on 30th August 2017 at the meeting with the South East Governors at Enugu. We have no reason to add or subtract from our position six years ago.
“9 Those who disrupted the 2017 peace process, only engineered and activated the unpleasant experiences of the past three years. Had they allowed the second meeting of September 15th, 2017 to hold, a meaningful outcome would have been long achieved. The unprovoked invasion of my family homestead on September 14th, 2017, which led to the untimely death of dozens of citizens and inspired the demise of my parents, created the unsavoury atmosphere that engulfed the region moving forward.
10 Finally, we reiterate that we are not opposed to a consensual but wholesome restructuring of the country along the 1963 constitution. Establishment of long-denied critical infrastructure in our region. Commercial Seaport, International Airport with cargo wing, rail services, and other deliberately denied infrastructure. Those determined to ride fellow citizens as donkeys, should understand that their refusal to treat every region fairly is at the root of our agitation for justice and equality.
The people of the region desire to be treated fairly and treated right. We stand by our demand for justice, equity, and fairness for all. This is our position. “
