IPOB Denies Involvement In Ahmed Gulak’s Murder, Condemns Media Misrepresentation

Here is a rewritten version of the news article for improved clarity, flow, and structure, while preserving all key facts:

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has firmly denied any involvement in the murder of Ahmed Gulak, a former political adviser to ex-President Goodluck Jonathan, dismissing all allegations linking the group to his death as unfounded.

In a statement issued by its Media and Publicity Secretary, Comrade Emma Powerful, IPOB described the claims as “false and misleading,” asserting that the group had no connection to the incident.

The statement clarified that the sit-at-home directive commemorating the annual Biafra Remembrance Day in 2021 was observed on Monday, May 31—not Sunday, May 30, the day Gulak was reportedly killed.

“This timeline alone proves that IPOB had no involvement in his death. Linking this tragic event to IPOB is baseless and irresponsible,” the group stated.

Response to Court Proceedings

IPOB also responded to the recent presentation of Ahmed Gulak’s death certificate during the ongoing trial of its leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. According to the group, the document is irrelevant to the case at hand and should not influence judicial proceedings.

“The introduction of Gulak’s death certificate has no bearing on the context of Kanu’s trial,” IPOB maintained.

Media Criticism and Call for Accuracy

The group went on to criticize what it described as “media misrepresentation,” accusing some outlets of circulating unverified claims without proper fact-checking. IPOB called on the press to uphold the principles of truth, accuracy, and objectivity.

“We urge all credible media organizations to review full court transcripts and verify facts before publishing. Misleading narratives only serve to distort public perception,” the statement added.

Reiterated Demand for Kanu’s Release

IPOB concluded by restating its demand for the “immediate and unconditional release” of its detained leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, insisting that his detention violates both domestic and international legal standards.