Alleged Certificate Forgery: Rep. Benjamin Kalu Floors Okey Ezeala, Chima Anyaso Again In Court

The Spokesperson of the House of Representatives Rep. Benjamin Kalu has been vindicated from the suit filed against him by Okey Ezeala alleging name forgery on his academic certifications.

Recall that one Okey Ezeala filed a case against the legislator claiming that there was a name discrepancy in his academic certificates. Also recall that Chima Anyaso, the candidate of the PDP who lost in the last election against the legislator made a failed attempt to join the suit earlier.

This is not the first time the federal legislator is defeating Anyaso in a legal battle.

ABN TV recalls that Hon. Kalu had after his victory in the 2019 election also defeated Anyaso at the election petition tribunal and later court of appeal in Owerri.

In a court judgement delivered by Justice A.O. Chijioke at the High Court in Umuahia, the judge dismissed the suit against Rep. Benjamin Kalu describing it as malicious. Justice Chijioke agreed with all the arguments of Rep. Benjamin Kalu’s lead Counsel, K.C Nwufor SAN, affirming that:
1. The matter is a pre-election matter and therefore statute-barred and frivolous.
2. Rep. Benjamin Kalu fully complied with the law in his change of name
3. The claimant failed to differentiate or prove his claims of forgery and impersonation against Rep. Benjamin Kalu.

READ ALSO: Claimant Fails To Prove Academic Documents Belong To Any Other Person But Rep Benjamin Kalu In Court

The court also agreed with K.C Nwufor SAN, that the claimant ought to have produced the original bearer of the name which Rep. Kalu was alleged to have impersonated.

Addressing Chima Anyaso’s attempt to join the suit as a co-claimant against Rep. Benjamin Kalu, the court described it as improper and malicious considering that Chima Anyaso had exhausted all his rights in this matter having lost at the election, election tribunal, and court of appeal.

In the 1-hour 30-minute long judgment, the court also stated that the suit against the legislator appeared to be a case of “the hand of Esau and the voice of Jacob”. Thus, confirming the statements made by the Senior Legislative Aide to Rep. Benjamin Kalu some days ago alleging that Chima Anyaso masterminded and funded this frivolous suit against Rep. Kalu in order to distract him from fulfilling his mandate.
Upon dismissing the case, the court also awarded costs against the Claimant.

Chima Anyaso and supporters were sighted in the court premises expectant that judgement would go against the Rep. Kalu. Attempts by our correspondents to interview him failed as he was nowhere to be found after the judgement was delivered, Drum Africa News.

Reacting to the news, Rep. Kalu said: ‘As I have always said, God is the God of justice. As a believer in God, I was confident that He would not allow injustice to be meted against me.

“Also, as a product of the judiciary, I had absolute confidence in the ability of the judiciary to sustain justice especially when the facts speak so clearly for themselves.

“I have experienced the competence of the judiciary from the time of the elections, tribunal, and court of appeal. So, I was certain that the judiciary would sustain their fairness and gladly they did not disappoint me. I thank my supporters who believed in me, who stood by me and showed great concern during this period.

“It has been a horrible two years, going in and out of court. The idea of this litigation was to distract me from working for the people of Bende, however, I have refused to be distracted. As you can see I am currently inspecting sites for new projects and several of the completed projects are set to be commissioned soon.’

In an interview with our correspondents, K.C Nwufor SAN, the lead counsel to Rep. Kalu, responded that all the grounds presented were fully upheld by the Court. He added.

‘It is a day for justice and I am happy that justice has been done. As you can see, this was a frivolous and malicious suit aimed at defaming the clean reputation of one of the best legislators Abia state has ever sent to Abuja. It was aimed at denting his reputation as the image-maker and spokesperson of the National Assembly; a man who resisted every attempt to blackmail him in this matter.

The character of our client has been defamed and so as we speak, we are preparing to file an action against the claimant and his co-detractors to the tune of 5 billion Naira for defamation of the character of our client and the institution that he represents.’